On Being a “Boomer”
"This column is dedicated to the proposition that Canada (and indeed the world) is in a crisis situation and that fundamental social change is required to remedy this situation." - The First Column, Lambda November 2, 1971 This blog is inspired by my column of the same name in the Laurentian University Newspaper, Lambda, from 1971-1973. The title refers to the concept of subverting the system from within. To read key excerpts from those columns read the first few posts in this blog.
Posted by rww at 22:13 1 comments
Labels: 1960s, Baby Boom, computers, Freenets, generations, health care, Internet, Labour Unions, middle class, peace movement, smart homes, smartphones, social change, technology, television, Vietnam War
Posted by rww at 20:13 1 comments
Labels: cable TV, Internet, streaming, television
Yes, that's right, because only being the very best in the world (well best at that particular place at that particular time) counts, the rest are all losers, so it seems.
Why do we rate the Olympics that way. The way we rate Olympic success should relate to what we want to accomplish, and the way we rate Olympics can have far reaching effects on how we fund sports and recreation in this country. We have already seen, at least in the past, funding shifted from less popular sports to sports that we have a better chance of winning Olympic medals in.
But what if we measured Olympic success by a points system that included all top ten finishes (tenth best in the world is pretty damn good by most peoples standards) with 10 points for first and one point for tenth.
We would get a much better picture of the depth and breadth of our elite athletes than just counting those in the top three. It would even give us a better measure of how we are progressing towards more medals in the future. And we could start doing it now retroactively using the records of past Olympics.
But is that even the point. Is it really justified to spend all this money on a “pissing contest” to prove we (well actually our elite athletes) are better than the rest of the world. What public policy goal does that serve.
We can only justify spending all this money on the Olympics if it serves some public benefit beyond giving Canadian another excuse to spend more time watching TV (while waving the flag) for two weeks every two years.
We can only justify spending this money if it benefits Canadians beyond the elite athletes that participate. We have to be able to show that the funding benefits a broad range of Canadians by funding sports and recreation for more than just elite athletes and by actually encouraging more Canadians to get involved in sports and recreation. That way we will see results in fitter and healthier Canadians with more balanced lifestyles and even reduced health care costs.
We won't know that if we measure the wrong things. Ultimately what we want to be able to measure is whether Olympic programs increase the participation of Canadians in sport and recreation ultimately leading to more balanced lifestyles and improving their fitness and health.
Knowing that we had the greatest percentage of citizens participating in sports and recreational activities would make me a lot more prouder than knowing that a small group of elite Canadian athletes were the best in the world. Now that is a goal to strive for.
Posted by rww at 10:41 0 comments
Labels: athletes, Canada, fitness, government expenditures, government policy, health, lifestyle, Olympic medals, Olympics2014, public policy, recreation, sports, television
Language (pre-history)
Written Language (circa 3200 BC)
The Printing Press (circa 1440 ) (Johannes Gutenberg)
Telephone (1861/1875)
Radio Broadcasting (circa 1910)
Television Broadcasting (1928/1936)
The Internet (1969) (ARPANET)
Smart Phones (1992) (RIM BlackBerry 1999)
Posted by rww at 21:10 0 comments
Labels: ARPANET, BlackBerry, communication, Internet, Johannes Gutenberg, language, printing press, radio, Research in Motion, RIM, smart phones, technology, telephone, television, written language
Posted by rww at 19:08 0 comments
Labels: Bible, Biblical quotes, gays and lesbians, homosexuality, President Josiah "Jed" Bartlet, television, video, West Wing
As far as I know they do not, but anyone who watches Ottawa CTV (CJOH) news might think otherwise as their news coverage of the attempt by the Ontario government to reduce generic drug costs and eliminate drug industry kickbacks to pharmacies could have been written by the pharmacy industry's PR departments.
Background: CBC News - Grits seek ban on generic drug fees
Posted by rww at 21:25 1 comments
Labels: CJOH, CTV, drugs and pharmaceuticals, generic drugs, kickbacks, Ottawa, pharmaceutical industry, prescription drugs, prices, Rexall, Shoppers Drug Mart, television
Next time your sitting there for minutes on end watching all those annoying commercials think about the commercials telling you that your not paying for local television.
Posted by rww at 20:10 0 comments
Labels: "Local TV Matters", advertising, television
Dr. David Suzuki is a respected scientist, world renowned environmentalist, and excellent communicator. So one would think that it would be difficult to make him look foolish. But the folks at powerWISE have found a way to do it.
I only hope that he is being well paid for the powerWISE commercials and putting the money to good use because, IMHO, they make him look like a fool.
Unfortunately the folks at powerWISE are very protective of their commercials so I was unable to embed a clip of the worst one, entitled “TV-Habitat” (the habitat of the common draft dodger), which makes me cringe every time I see it. The only copy of it I found on the web outside of the powerWISE site had been removed for a “terms of use violation”.
The powerwise ads can be viewed here.
My advice to Dr. Suzuki, never leave your image in the hands of the advertising industry again.
Posted by rww at 12:33 3 comments
Labels: “habitat of the common draft dodger”, advertising, commercials, David Suzuki, environment, powerWISE, television
According to The Code on CBC's The Fifth Estate almost everyone involved in professional hockey from the head of the NHL down believes that fighting is an important and integral part of the game. So why are there rules and penalties against it. And why are the rules and penalties so lax as to be ineffective.
There seems to be something just a little bit hypocritical about having purposefully ineffective rules against something that they claim to be an integral part of the game.
Posted by rww at 12:31 0 comments
Labels: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, CBC, fighting, hockey, hypocrisy, National Hockey League, NHL, sports, television, The Code, The Fifth Estate
I have to say I like the new Conservative Party "certainty" ad, although it is not available on their website. It is not an attack ad but just a straightforward statement of their basic philosophy - change is bad and new ideas are dangerous. Refreshing.
Posted by rww at 14:12 3 comments
Labels: 2008 federal election, advertising, change, Conservative Party, ideology, new ideas, philosophy, television
That’s what a penny buys today, compared to 1914, which is as far back as the Bank of Canada Inflation Calculator goes. The buying power of a penny back in 1914 was equivalent to 19 pennies today and nobody saw the need for a nineteenth of a cent coin. So why do we need a penny or a even a nickel today, which was worth almost a dollar (94 cents) back then in today’s buying power. We already have the loonie so we don’t need the nickel. But I would keep the dime, even if it is, relatively speaking, the equivalent of having a half cent coin in 1914.
In fact we have acted at the other end of the coin spectrum by recognizing inflation has turned one and two dollar bills into small change, so we added two new coins, the loonie and the twonie. Now it is time to eliminate the two at the bottom, the penny and the nickel.
For those that are concerned about losing a few nineteenths of a cent in the rounding process we could require that all prices be a multiple of ten cents and that all sales taxes be rounded down to the nearest ten cents.
Pat Martin has the right idea we just need to take it to the next logical step.
And while we are at it maybe retailers can stop treating customers as idiots with their silly pricing, such as labeling an item $1.97 to try to make us think it is priced under two dollars. Does anyone really think a car buyer does not know a sticker price of $29,989 really means $30,000. But then again, anyone who watches television commercials these days knows retailers think we are idiots.
Posted by rww at 07:52 0 comments
Labels: abolition of the cent, advertising, Bill C-531, coins, Currency Act, inflation, nickel, one cent coin, Pat Martin, penny, prices, retailers, Royal Canadian Mint Act, sales taxes, television
Much has been written about the “censorship” provisions in Bill C-10. One might argue that it is not “censorship” but just the government setting standards for what it is willing to fund with taxpayers money. However, as others have pointed out, here are already provisions that prevent “pornography” from being funded. This is much more odious than that.
It is one thing to say the government will not fund “objectionable” content. It is another to say it will only fund content that promotes the goals of the governing party. That is what this provision allows and even mandates.
The key wording in Bill C-10 is the following phrase used to describe what the government would fund:
“(b) public financial support of the production would not be contrary to public policy”
Note the careful choice of words. We are not talking about the “public interest” but about “public policy”. What is “public policy”. What other interpretation could there be other than that it refers to “government policy”, and “government policy” is established by the party in power and changes as governments change.
At best, it is so ambiguous that film and television producers would never know if a film or television program would be eligible for funding or not. At worse, the government would be mandated not to provide public funding to films or programs that are contrary to Conservative Party policy.
Of course the government will argue that is not what it means. If so, why is that what it says.
At least one Member of the House of Commons has admitted to voting for Bill C-10 without knowing that provision was there. That is not surprising. The provision is well hidden in a 600 page tax bill. Simply for the reason that Members of Parliament were not aware of this clause, the Senate should send it back to the House of Commons for reconsideration.
Posted by rww at 11:48 0 comments
Labels: Bill C-10, censorship, Conservative Party, film industry, films, government funding, House of Commons, Income Tax Act, movies, pornography, public policy, Senate, tax incentives, television
Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger fought the battle for the rights of common people and workers with music.
Tuesday at night at 9:00 PM on Vision TV, Bound for Glory, the biography of Woody Guthrie, will be shown. It will be broadcast on Channel 61 on Rogers Cable in Ottawa.
Bound for Glory is a New York Times Critics Pick.
You can read more about Woody Guthrie on the Woody Guthrie Foundation website.
Wednesday PBS features the documentary, American Masters: Pete Seeger: The Power of Song. I was unable to determine the time or channel it will be shown on in Ottawa even though it was featured in the Ottawa Citizen’s TV Times, but I found it listed on several PBS stations at 9:00 PM.
Mark Klempner reviewed the documentary for the Huffington Post.
You can read more about Pete Seeger on the Pete Seeger Appreciation Page website.
My daddy was a miner
And I'm a miner's son
And I'll stick with the union
Till every battle's won
Posted by rww at 09:17 0 comments
Labels: American Masters: Pete Seeger: The Power of Song, Bound for Glory, folk music, Labour Unions, PBS, Pete Seeger, Solidarity Forever, television, Vision TV, Woody Guthrie, workers
Well, at least I am smarter than an American 5th Grader. I got all of the questions correct unaided last night, including the million dollar question. I did happen to luck out on the American history question as it was also a Canadian history question, about the war of 1812. Fortunately they did not ask who won, or they would have been wrong. But then the million dollar question turned out to be an American history question also. But fortunately it was "who was the first American to break the sound barrier". I cannot believe that the neuroscience PhD student missed Chuck Yeager and walked away with $25,000.
While these types of shows are really more about knowledge than intelligence I can still say "I am smarter than a fifth grader".
Posted by rww at 13:18 1 comments
Labels: Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader, Fox Broadcasting Company, television
I watched the first episode of The Border last night and I was impressed. It was hard to watch because even though you know it’s fictional you know it is also based on reality. The reality in the case of government anti-terrorism activities is that you do not know who the bad guys are. It is hard to cheer for the “good guys” when they may be railroading some innocent Canadian because of ethnicity or religion.
Of course this is television so everything is going to be simplified and exaggerated but nonetheless it was a compelling story with compelling characters. One might question whether the episode’s hero going against his Ottawa bosses was realistic, but then I wake up and read about Linda Keen this morning. These people do exist and they make great real Canadian heroes.
The show ends after vindicating the innocent Canadian by reminding us that real terrorists are out there and we have to fight terrorism while respecting all Canadians civil liberties and human rights.
Now to find out more about the “rogue American agent” in next week’s episode.
Posted by rww at 11:41 0 comments
Labels: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, CBC, civil liberties, human rights, Linda Keen, television, terrorism, The Border
Is Doctor Phil going to save Britney. Read all about it here and here.
Doctor Phil is on the case. Is he going to save Britney. Of course, Doctor Phil’s usual way of saving people is to tell them to straighten up and then refer them to the “best professional help money can buy”. Apparently embarrassing yourself on network TV is a small price to pay for the kind of help the American health care system only provides to it’s wealthiest citizens.
But, of course, Britney is one of those wealthiest citizens (and apparently loves embarrassing herself in front of the world). Indeed she no doubt has been told to straighten out many times by those that care about her and has had the best professional help money can buy. She has just chosen to ignore them and reject the help provided to her.
But now Doctor Phil is on the case and no doubt he will be asking the hard question about her current lifestyle - “how is that working for you”. Everything else has failed. Perhaps getting counseling where it really counts, on Network TV, will be the solution. Doctor Phil, tell us “it’s going to be a changing day in her life”.
Posted by rww at 13:16 0 comments
Labels: Britney Spears, celebrities, Doctor Phil, Dr. Phil McGraw, music industry, television, The Dr. Phil Show
Don't you just love Canadian drug ads. I know they have me hooked, I'm heading down to the drugstore right now to get bottles of "dancing in the street like a fool", "floating through the meadow" and maybe I'll pick up a couple of bottles of "talk like an alien baby".
One of the most interesting is the Viagara retirement speech ad where the retiree is bleeped, apparently for saying, so we are supposed to think, that he is going to have more sex, or some euphemism therefor. Of course, we're supposed to think he's being bleeped because he mentions sex, but actually it is because to do so would come too close to telling the people what the drug is for and in Canada drug ads cannot mention the name of the drug and the disease or ailment it treats. That is why you see all these drug ads that give you no clue what the drug treats, or you see "education" ads about an ailment telling you to ask your doctor about new treatments (in the hopes he will prescribe the drug that is being "advertised").
If the government wants to ban drug advertising why do they not do it directly, instead of taking this approach that forces us to watch these inane drug ads. There is no reason for drug advertising in Canada. Prescription drugs should not be self-prescribed in a country where anyone can see a doctor without personal cost. It is the doctor's role to diagnose conditions and prescribe drugs. If patients want to do research on the Internet or in books and ask their doctors about specific treatments or drugs they can do that. Drug companies so-called "education' ads are only veiled attempts to sell products.
It is time to spare us the suffering and take those inane drug ads off our television screens.
Posted by rww at 14:40 0 comments
Labels: advertising, commercials, prescription drugs, television, Viagara
I was channel surfing the other day when I came upon a televangelist on the CTS Network. This is not my usual thing to watch but it caught my attention because, although it was obviously a preacher talking, it sounded more like a real estate seminar. Apparently god created the world so that we could own it and where the Bible talks about eliminating poverty it means everyone should buy their own home and real estate.
At the end of the show I realized it was entitled “Washed By the Word' with Dr. Pat Francis. They provided the website address, which I just had to check out.
I found out this organization operates “Education & Kingdom Businesses”, including an elementary and secondary school in Ontario. They also sell “educational material” including an interesting video entitled “Anointed In the Marketplace”.
Anointed In the Marketplace will help to position you for your king-priest calling. As a king you are anointed with power, influence, wealth and wisdom to lead others. As a priest you are anointed to minister to others, pray, intercede and to advance His Kingdom. You are anointed. You are what you believe. His anointed will manifest in you place of work whether it is in the marketplace or at home. You are anointed for influence.Maybe this is mainstream out there in the religious community but it struck me as something strange to come across on basic cable that almost everyone receives. That makes it a great marketing tool, and preaching appears to have become the marketing tool of the religion business in the modern age.
Once you understand your calling you will no longer work for a living but will fulfill your calling to represent God wherever He positions you with more power and influence. Send for Anointed In the Marketplace today and start your full-time ministry as a king-priest servant of God.
I am believing with you.
Posted by rww at 15:23 1 comments
Labels: “Anointed in the Marketplace”, “king-priest”, “Washed By The Word”, Bible, business, Dr. Pat Francis, home ownership, marketing, poverty, real estate, religion, televangelists, television
Last night's Law and Order SVU episode (Harm) took on the United States military torture techniques resulting in a backlash and attacks on the producers and actors as being traitors for presenting a show that opposed torture.
Some of the comments included:
"That was the most anti american propoganda episode I have ever seen. I am actually offended that NBC would air that. Our poor soldiers out in Iraq fighting for our lives and freedoms and NBC airs an anti torture episode to gain points politically. That is pretty low NBC."
"This was the most biased anti american show I have ever seen.NBC should be declared a terrorist tool."
"I consider this episode anti-American and the Prodcers, Actors and NBC Traitors. Until this episode it was one of my favorite shows. I will not watch it again. It was one of the few reasons I ever tuned into NBC. I have stopped watching the news on NBC because of its left wing bias."
Is torture as American as apple pie now, requiring that it be defended by patriotic god-fearing Americans.
Posted by rww at 16:44 1 comments
Labels: Law and Order SVU, NBC, patriotism, television, torture, treason, United States military