I
am writing this as a citizen of a world (and also as someone with a
degree in Political Science) that no matter where we live are
strongly impacted by whatever America does and whatever happens in
America.
There
are no easy solutions to the problems facing America today as I wrote
in THE
FIFTH COLUMN: Can America Be Saved.
These
are the three most important changes I think need to be made to
American electoral politics, although all three would require a
tremendous amount of political will to make them happen.
1
– Eliminate politicians from controlling the electoral process
Elections
cannot be free and democratic if they are run by politicians that
benefit from their results, especially when they have a history of
gerrymandering boundaries and suppressing the voting ability of their
opponents voters. The United States needs a single neutral
non-partisan non-political agency similar to Elections
Canada
to
oversee their federal elections.
2
– Eliminate money from controlling the electoral process
Money
should not be a gatekeeper to the electoral process. Elections should
not be something that can be bought. Voting should not be like shopping where whoever spends the most on marketing gets the most customers.
There need to be reasonable limits on spending by parties and
candidates. There also needs to be reasonable limits on donations to
political parities and candidates including a ban on corporate
donations and the elimination of PACs and Super PACs. If people want
to donate they should donate to the candidate of their choice or to a
registered political party..
For
example Canada’s spending and donation limits are outlined here:
Understanding spending limits – Elections Canada
Limits on Contributions – 2025 – Elections Canada
3
– Eliminate the domination of two parties in the electoral process
The
American two party system, which shuts out any other party’s
candidates,
with a few notable exceptions like Independent Senator Bernie Sanders
and a few left leaning Democrats who might be considered Social Democrats, limits the representation of Americans political views
to those of the two major parties and leaves many voters not voting
for their choice of candidate or party but for the lessor evil of the
two parties they do not support, and leaves many voters feeling
unrepresented and that their votes do not count.
The solution to
this, at least for the House of Representatives, would be the
implementation of Proportional representation that would see all Americans political views
represented and all votes counting.
Proportional
representation would be difficult to do in the Senate with only two
Senators per state, although possibly feasible with 4 Senators per
state. Alternatively Ranked voting would at least allow voters to select their preferred
candidate as their first choice.
And then there is
the Presidency with the archaic Electoral College system which can, and has, allowed the
candidate with the fewer votes (of the actual voters) to become
President. Why there has not been a popular uprising against this I
will never understand. Clearly since proportional representative
cannot be used for a single position, the obvious choice is a direct
popular vote of citizens using ranked voting to elect the President,
allowing every voter to vote for their preferred candidate as their
first choice without losing the opportunity vote for their choice of
the two leading candidates at the end of the process.
Postscript
–The Senate
When
I was looking at the impact of the two party system on the
representation of American voters political positions and
philosophies in Congress I
could not help but think about the Senate and the issue of
Representation by population.
I am aware the Senate was not intended to be based on rep
by pop but I was not aware of just how egregious the rejection of
that principal was, considering that the Senate has as much political power as the House of Representatives and
indeed individual Senators seem to be more influential than
individual Members of the House of Representative.
As
of 2025 the population of the 50 American states is 347.3
million (Source),
while the population of the 25 least populated states is under 10
million (Source).
The math says the voters in the least populated states have over 30
times the representation in the Senate than the voters in the most
populated states. Again I have to say I do not understand why there
has not been a popular uprising against this among the 97% of
excessively under-represented voters.
I have no solution
for this but it seems to me to be an affront to democracy. I
sometimes wonder if Americans think their political system is god
given and they have no right to change it.