2010-04-04
2010-03-25
The American Dream and Lazy Poor People
As a Canadian I find it very difficult to understand the attitude of many Americans, and not just the extreme right, that the poor do not deserve health care and particularly that their hard earned tax dollars should not pay for it.
The only reason I can come up for this is that they really do believe in the America Dream - literally and completely. That dream being that if you work hard you can become rich. If you follow that reasoning to it's logical conclusion then, if you are not rich you did not work hard, and if you are poor it is because you are lazy.
While that may seem absurd, a lot of things Americans believe are pretty absurd by Canadian standards, as seen by the results of this public opinion poll.
Posted by
rww
at
09:16
0
comments
Labels: American Dream, health care, laziness, polls, poverty, public opinion, United States
2010-03-24
How Stupid Can Someone Be
Finally someone stupider than Sarah Palin
Posted by
rww
at
09:03
0
comments
Labels: Ann Coulter, bigots, Canada, idiots, racists, Vietnam War, xenophobes
2010-03-12
Sudbury Steelworkers Stand Strong in Solidarity
![]()
Support Local 6500 Sudbury
Posted by
rww
at
06:25
1 comments
Labels: folk music, Labour Unions, Pete Seeger, Solidarity Forever, strikes, Sudbury, United Steelworkers Local 6500, VALE INCO, War on Workers
2010-03-10
Fifth Column in Limbo ?
I apologize for the Fifth Column going into apparent limbo. The Fifth Column hopes to be back to reasonably regular postings (at least a few times a week) soon.
Posted by
rww
at
12:27
0
comments
Labels: blogs and blogging, The Fifth Column
2010-03-05
Liberals Pretend to Oppose Tory Budget
In a bold move yesterday the leader of Canada's Natural Abstaining Party declared "Liberals will vote against the budget but not in sufficient numbers to defeat the government".
This was further clarified: "A senior Liberal, talking on background, said the party will probably register its opposition to the budget through absences of MPs from the confidence votes in the weeks ahead".
Posted by
rww
at
07:05
0
comments
Labels: abstention, budget, confidence convention, Conservative Party, Jim Flaherty, Liberal Party, Michael Ignatieff, Stephen Harper, votes
2010-03-04
Follow Me
With the Olympics, the great biking weather and other stuff to do lately I have been somewhat neglecting the Fifth Column but I hope to get back into things shortly.
In the meantime I thought I would thank my Followers. Looking at blog stats is one thing but seeing readers actually take the time to "follow" my blog really keeps me encouraged to keep writing.
If you are a regular reader you can follow my blog by clicking "Follow" on the right.
Posted by
rww
at
09:44
0
comments
Labels: blogs and blogging, The Fifth Column
2010-02-27
Curling - WOW
Yes, I've been watching Olympic curling. What a combination of science, art, and athletic control. I could try and explain that but the best way to understand it is to watch international or Brier level competition.
Posted by
rww
at
19:11
0
comments
Labels: 2010 Olympics, art, curling, science, sports, Winter Olympics
2010-02-20
Numbers
Which ranking is more important to you, and which should the government spend more money on improving.
This Number
or
This Number.
Posted by
rww
at
13:15
1 comments
Labels: Canada, economic and social conditions, government expenditures, government policy, Olympic medals, sports, statistics, United Nations Human Development Index
2010-02-17
Who Is To Blame For The Olympics
So is it all just fun and games and are we all just blind to what is wrong with the Olympics.
I don't think so. I think many people have problems with what the Olympics have become with more emphasis on profit than sport and more emphasis on sponsors than athletes, not to mention the impact on the communities the Olympics are held in, which is more often positive for the wealthy and negative for the poor. On the other hand, many have been sucked into the spectacle that the Olympics have become, a spectacle that is dependent on, and supportive of, corporate money and sponsors. Sponsors money feeds the spectacle and the spectacle feeds corporate profits and somewhere in there is IOC empire building.
But we support the Olympics anyway because we still believe in the ideal, and more importantly because it is the only Olympics that the athletes have.
As for the Olympic sponsors, some seem to be really bizarre.
I do find it ironic that the company that has been exploiting Canadians longer than any other company is an official sponsor, especially since their Canadian Olympic clothing is "Made in China", but they do have the protection of the Fashion Police.
I also find it really strange to watch world class athletes promoting McJunk food and I have to wonder how many IOC or VANOC dinner meetings have been held at the Official Restaurant of the Olympics. And then there are the official Olympic drugs, not to mention official beer and wine suppliers. And what is a sporting event without an official gambling provider.
And I am offended by the fact that the Olympic organizers are forcing Canadians, and visitors, who want to use a credit card at the Olympics (and do not have the right card) to get a new one.
And then there is this.
There have been protests raising serious concerns about the Olympics, although protesting at an international sports/cultural event obviously does not receive the same amount of public acceptance as protesting at international political/economic events. The protests have included some damage to the property of corporate sponsors by masked "protesters". They state their case here.
While I can certainly agree that the minimal physical damage done by these masked "protesters" is nowhere near the damage done to the poor and disadvantaged by the holding of the games I cannot condone it, primarily because it does more harm than good to the cause.
I am one who believes people should stand up for what they believe in and not hide behind masks. I am even uncomfortable with the concept of anonymous blogging, but I can understand the reason for it and it does no harm to anyone. If these "protesters" want to make a point about damage done to the poor by doing damage to the property of those they consider to be causing it, then do it out in the open, surrender to the police, and then argue your case in the courts of law and public opinion.
But what I would suggest, as an alternative to protests that alienate the public, is that in the future the emphasis be put on the People’s Summit aspect of the protests and that the protesters propose to the Olympic organizers that they will not take to the streets in exchange for the Olympic organizers sanctioning and publicizing a People’s Summit that examines all aspects of the Olympics. The media should pledge to give the People’s Summit reasonable coverage, especially the host broadcaster. The People’s Summit should be completely independent, possibly university based, and include full criticism of the Olympics. It should provide for some participation by Olympic organizers, which would allow them to state their case and, more importantly, allow them to be held accountable by the public for their actions.
This will be to both sides advantage - the serious protesters will be better able to make their case and reach the public without a public backlash and they will not be tainted by the actions of so-called anarchists, who will be marginalized and easier for the organizers to deal with.
This is not to say that the problems are not serious enough to justify taking to the streets but that the alternative can be more effective in reaching, rather than alienating, the public.
Of course if Olympic organizers are not prepared to be subjected to public scrutiny and public criticism they can always reject the idea and suffer the consequences of continuing, and probably escalating protests at future Olympics.
In closing, I want to say, as a Canadian, that I am proud of all our Bronze Medal Winners and others in the world can make as many jokes about that as they want. I do not believe that you're a loser if you don't win a gold medal. Indeed, if you've worked hard enough to actually be good enough to participate in the Olympics you're already a Winner and I am proud of all of our Olympic athletes.
Posted by
rww
at
14:54
0
comments
Labels: 2010 Olympics, athletes, capitalism, corporate sponsors, corporations, IOC, medals, poverty, press and media, profits, property damage, protesters, protests, sports, Vancouver, VANOC, Winter Olympics
