"This column is dedicated to the proposition that Canada (and indeed the world) is in a crisis situation and that fundamental social change is required to remedy this situation." - The First Column, Lambda November 2, 1971
This blog is inspired by my column of the same name in the Laurentian University Newspaper, Lambda, from 1971-1973. The title refers to the concept of subverting the system from within.
To read key excerpts from those columns read the first few posts in this blog.
the leader of the current government (the government before the election) has the right to meet the House and attempt to gain its confidence, however usually the party with the most seats gets the first opportunity to be Prime Minister and lead the government
responsible government requires that the Prime Minister maintains the confidence of the House of Commons to govern
a minority government cannot survive if it attempts to govern as if it had a majority
a Prime Minister cannot bully the House of Commons into supporting him by threatening an election if he doesn't get his way
there is always a Prime Minister in waiting willing to attempt to gain and maintain the confidence of the House if the Prime Minister cannot or is not not willing to
a government is legitimate, and only legitimate, if it has the confidence of the House of Commons
minority governments can work if a Prime Minister recognizes it is the House of Commons that was elected to govern, not him by divine right
minority governments can implement, and have implemented, important measures including Old Age Pensions, Medicare and the Canada Pension Plan
Your 2nd point is incorrect. The incumbent government gets first shot at trying to see if it can command the confidence of the House. For example, in last year's election in the UK, Labour, the incumbent party, finished second to the Tories, but they looked at options, including negotiating with the Lib Dems, to see if any coalition or agreement could be arrived at that would make numbers work. When it was clear that this wouldn't happen, FIVE days after the election, then Brown resigned. Same rules apply in Canada. I've blogged extensively about this on my own blog.
Search engines results for blog postings can be weird. If a search engine, such as Google, brought you to a Fifth Column posting that does not seem right use the Search Option above or scroll down this column on the right till you get to the labels section and check the labels for what you are searching for.
Richard W. Woodley was born in Sudbury, Ontario in 1950. He earned an Honours Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Laurentian University where he was the News Editor of the student newspaper Lambda and active in student politics. He was active in the New Democratic Party and Waffle in Sudbury and Kanata, as well as Kanata municipal politics. He was a member of the Bridlewood Residents Hydro Line Committee (BRHLC) and creator of the now archived Bridlewood Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Information Service. He worked on Parliament Hill for 33 years indexing the Debates of the House of Commons (Hansard) and it's committees.
Richard has been an outdoorsperson and environmentalist for most of his life and a life long cyclist.
2 comments:
Your 2nd point is incorrect. The incumbent government gets first shot at trying to see if it can command the confidence of the House. For example, in last year's election in the UK, Labour, the incumbent party, finished second to the Tories, but they looked at options, including negotiating with the Lib Dems, to see if any coalition or agreement could be arrived at that would make numbers work. When it was clear that this wouldn't happen, FIVE days after the election, then Brown resigned. Same rules apply in Canada. I've blogged extensively about this on my own blog.
Radical Centrist is correct and I have modified the post accordingly.
Post a Comment